fin-glassbox

Clean Architecture Blueprint

1. System idea

Your framework now has three main intelligence streams:

  1. Technical Market Stream Learns temporal market behaviour using an attention-based time-series encoder.

  2. Text / Sentiment / News Stream Uses FinBERT for financial text understanding.

  3. Fundamental Stream Uses structured company financial data.

These streams feed into:

  1. Risk Engine The most important control layer.

  2. Fusion Layer Combines all outputs into a final decision.

  3. Trade Approval + XAI Produces the final recommendation and explanations.


2. Exact stage-by-stage blueprint

Stage 0 — Input layer

Inputs


Stage 1 — Data processing layer

1A. Technical encoder

Model

Shared Temporal Attention Encoder

Purpose

This is your main time-series encoder. It should learn:

Output

A latent market representation used by:

Practical note

Since you want attention but not a massive custom transformer stack, define this block as:

That keeps your design honest and flexible.


1B. NLP encoder

Model

FinBERT

Purpose

Understands:

Output

Feeds:


1C. Fundamental encoder / model

Model options

Purpose

Understands:

Output

Feeds:


3. Analyst layer

2A. Technical Analyst

Uses encoded market sequence to output:

2B. Sentiment Analyst

Uses FinBERT outputs to determine:

2C. News Analyst

Uses FinBERT outputs to determine:

2D. Fundamental Analyst

Uses structured company data to determine:


4. Risk engine

This is now the strongest part of your architecture.

3A. Volatility Estimation Model

Input

Encoded time-series output

Purpose

Estimate:

Model suggestion

Output

Volatility risk score


3B. Drawdown Risk Model

Input

Encoded time-series output

Purpose

Estimate:

Model suggestion

Output

Drawdown risk score


3C. Value at Risk (VaR)

Method

Historical VaR

Purpose

Estimate threshold loss under historical distribution.

Output

VaR score / cutoff


3D. Expected Shortfall (CVaR)

Method

Historical CVaR

Purpose

Estimate average tail loss beyond VaR.

Output

Tail-risk severity score


3E. Correlation / Contagion Risk

Model

GNN-based relation model for risk propagation

Purpose

This is where your relational finance modeling lives.

It should capture:

Input

Cross-asset graph built from:

Output

Contagion / dependency risk score


3F. Liquidity Risk Model

Input

Volume, turnover, maybe spread proxies

Purpose

Estimate:

Output

Liquidity score / execution feasibility score


3G. Regime Risk Model

Input

Purpose

This model is now a twin bridge between market state and text state.

It should estimate:

Output

Market regime classification + regime confidence


3H. Position Sizing Engine

Inputs

All risk submodule outputs:

Purpose

Convert risk into capital allocation logic.

Output

Recommended:

Model suggestion

Do not start with a big learned model here.

Use:

This block must remain interpretable.


5. Analysis split

Qualitative analysis

Comes from:

These are your “reasoning-rich” or context-heavy signals.

Quantitative analysis

Comes from:

These are your numerical market and risk signals.


6. Fusion layer

You said you will discuss this later with your group, so I’ll keep it architecture-neutral but clean.

Fusion Engine

Role

Combine:

Future implementation options

Output


7. Final decision layer

Final Trade Approver

Takes:

Returns:


8. XAI layer

You already decided this correctly.

XAI Layer produces:


9. Final output

The user sees:


10. Modules


11. Final compact blueprint

INPUTS
├── Historical Market Data
├── Financial Text Data
├── Fundamental Company Data
└── Cross-Asset Relation Data

ENCODERS
├── Shared Temporal Attention Encoder
├── FinBERT Financial Text Encoder
└── Fundamental Model

ANALYST MODULES
├── Technical Analyst
├── Sentiment Analyst
├── News Analyst
└── Fundamental Analyst

RISK ENGINE
├── Volatility Estimation Model
├── Drawdown Risk Model
├── Historical VaR
├── CVaR
├── GNN Contagion Risk Model
├── Liquidity Risk Model
├── Regime Detection Model
└── Position Sizing Engine

SYNTHESIS
├── Qualitative Analysis
├── Quantitative Analysis
└── Fusion Engine

DECISION
└── Final Trade Approver

EXPLAINABILITY
└── XAI Layer

OUTPUT
├── Buy / Hold / Sell
├── Confidence Score
├── Position Size
├── Risk Summary
└── Final Explanation


Proposed architecture for an explainable distributed financial risk management framework integrating temporal market encoding, financial text understanding, fundamental analysis, multi-component risk estimation, fusion-based decision synthesis, and final explainability output.

Final Architecture Diagram